| Anti-scatter grids are simple and
functional tools that improve the diagnostic quality of radiographs
by trapping the greater part of scattered radiation. Scattered
radiation is probably the biggest factor contributing to the poor
diagnostic quality of radiographs. Its effect produces a general
radiographic fog on the film which reduces the contrast.

The best-known way to effectively
remove the greater part of radiation scatter is by the use of an
x-ray anti-scatter grid. Radiation which does not travel in the same
direction as the primary beam is absorbed by the lead strips of the grid. Since Dr. Gustav
Bucky built the first grid in 1913, his original principle of lead
foil strips standing on edge separated by x-ray transparent
interspacers has remained one of the best-known technique to trap
the scatter

Types of Filter Grids
X-ray
grids are commercially available with either focused
or parallel lead strips, and these two types are
produced in either linear or crossed
grid configuration. The focused grid has its leads angled
progressively in such a way that lines drawn through each lead and
continued out of the gird will intersect at a point known as the
grid focus. When strips are not progressively angulated but are
perpendicular to the surface of the grid, the grid is termed
"parallel" (See Figure 1).

Both the focused or parallel grids may be made in either the linear
or crossed grid type. The linear grid is made with the lengths of
all its leads in the same direction. The crossed grid is usually two
linear grids, one on top of the other, with the leads of the top
grid crossing those of the lower grid (See Figure 2).

In general, the crossed grid will remove more scattered radiation
than a linear grid of ratio equal to the combined ratios of its two
parts, e.g., a crossed grid, each of whose parts has 5:1 ratio, will
remove more scattered radiation than a linear grid of 10:1 ratio.
This advantage is more striking at voltages under 100 KVP.
The advantage of the linear grid over the crossed grid is that it
may be used in tilted-tube techniques without undue "cut-off" in the
radiograph. This is true with grid ratios 8:1 and lower and only if
the angle of tilt of the tube is in a direction parallel to the
length of the leads. Tilting the tube at an angle across the leads
will result in serious density reduction (cut off) on the film. With
higher ratio grids, tube angling must be slight or focal distance
long to avoid marked density variation.
Construction of Grids &
Significance of Grid Ratio
The prime
purpose of a grid being the absorption of stray radiation, lead
strips (the material which is most practical in the absorption of
x-rays) are its basic component. The strips -- five hundred or two
thousands or more of them -- are set on edge, properly angled to a
mean focal distance and separated by x-ray transparent interspacers.
The whole is bonded together into a single flat structure, suitably
covered for strength, durability and protection against moisture. The ratio of a grid is defined as the
relation of the height of the lead strips to the distance between
them. Thus with interspacers 5 times as high as they are wide, a
grid is said to be 5:1 ratio, etc. Generally speaking, the higher
the ratio of a grid, the more scattered radiation is absorbed (see
Diagram).

As grid ratio increases, the necessity of having the focused grid
exactly centered and perfectly level under the x-ray tube becomes
more and more important. Also, it becomes more necessary to use the
grid as its focal distance from the tube, instead of being able to
use it through a range of distances. For example, the 40" focal
distance, 16:1 ratio grid must be used at 40" for satisfactory
results, and must be perfectly centered and leveled.
The 5:1 ratio focused grid, on the
other hand, will give satisfactory results over a wide range of
focal distances, and need not to be as accurately centered or
leveled. Of course the 5:1 ratio linear grid will not have nearly
the effectiveness of secondary removal that the 16:1 has, but in ost
cases this may be willingly sacrificed to gain the latitude and
ease-of-use of the low ratio grid. However, a 5:1 crossed grid will
produce as good secondary removal as 16:1 grid at low kilo-voltages,
while retaining the latitude of the 5:1 ratio.
Selection Considerations
In
order to prevent the shadows cast onto the film by the grid from
interfering with visualization of diagnostic detail, certain
principles must be followed:
-
For one,
the lead should be as thin as possible to be consistent with
adequate absorption of scattered radiation.The thinner the lead,
the narrower the shadow it will produce on the film and the less
visible it will be to the eye.
-
Also, the
thinner it is the less absorption of primary radiation will be in
the grid. However, it must be noted that adequate absorption of
scattered radiation is the function of the grid and lead must be
thick enough to provide this function.
-
Another
factor is the relative fineness of the grid. This quality is
represented by the number of lines per inch. In general, the
greater the number of lines per inch, the less visible will the
individual lines be, but this is subject to certain practical
considerations which modify it in actual use.
Practical Considerations in Grid Selection:
The quantity of
scattered radiation produced is dependent on the thickness and
relative density of the body being radiographed. A non-grid exposure
of the chest will consist of about one half scattered radiation,
while a non-grid exposure of the abdomen may consist of more than
90% scattered radiation.
From this, it is apparent that for dense body sections the more
effective removal of scattered radiation will provide the most
striking improvement in the radiograph. This suggests the use of a
high ratio grid or a crossed grid. The choice between these two
grids depends on the ease of aligning the grid correctly relative to
the x-ray tube, and whether a high or low voltage techniques are in
use.
If there are questions about the proper centering or leveling, or if
low kilovoltages are in use, a low ratio grid will present much
greater advantage from the point of view of positioning latitude and
cleanup. For high voltage techniques, if the grid can be accurately
aligned (see effect of misalignment in Figures 1 & 2 below), greater
advantages will result from the use of an 8:1 ratio crossed grid or
high ratio linear grid.
At kilovoltages of the order of 100 KVP or more, comparable
radiographic effect requires low milliampere-second values than at
low kilovoltages, thus reducing the radiation dosage to the patient.

However, in order to maintain the same contrast range of the
higher kilovoltage, it is necessary to use a higher ratio grid. The
exposure factors are not the same for all ratios, and the increased
exposure required for a high ratio grid may to some extent reduce
the patient-dosage advantage gained by going to higher kilovoltage
techniques. In general, in spite of the higher exposure factors
involved, the use of high kilovoltage and high ratio grids will
result in somewhat lower radiation dosage to the patient.

All
radiographers must work within the limitations of the physical
characteristics of the x-ray equipment at their disposal. While this
may not be as important a consideration in the selection of a grid
as some others, it is a factor to be considered. For instance, the
maximum benefits to be derived from a 16:1 ratio grid will not be
realized with a unit whose top limit is 90 KVP, although there will
be some advantage over a lower ratio grid. In general, a 16:1 ratio
grid will do the most good with equipment which can be used at
kilovoltages above 100 KVP.
This applies also, to a lesser extent, to the 12:1 ratio grid. With
a bedside or portable unit, where the likelihood of near-perfect
alignment of the grid relative to the primary beam is poor, the use
of the high ratio grids is practically impossible, and difficulties
may be encountered even with the 8:1 ratio grids. For such use,
where wide latitude in distance, centering, and leveling is
necessary, the 5:1 ratio grid is advisable, and for maximum cleanup
under these conditions the 5:1 crossed grid is ideal.
Selection Guidelines
Choosing
the correct grid for your application may be a difficult task. MXE
provides technical advice to assist you in selecting the proper
grids and evaluating their performance.
(1) X-ray Grid Selection Based on Clean-up Requirements:
|
Cleanup |
Ratio/Type |
Positioning
Latitude |
Recommended
Up To |
Remarks |
|
SUPERLATIVE |
8:1 criss-cross |
Distance fair; centering and
leveling-slight |
120 KVP |
Not recommended for tilted tube
technique |
|
EXCELLENT |
12:1 linear |
Very slight |
110 KVP (Suitable for highr KV) |
Extra care required for proper
alignment; usually used in fixed mount |
|
EXCELLENT |
6:1 criss-cross |
Good
|
100 KVP |
Tube tilt limited to five degrees |
|
GOOD |
8:1 linear |
Distance fair; centering and
leveling-slight |
100 KVP |
For general stationary grid use |
|
MODERATE |
6:1 linear |
Good |
80 KVP |
Least expensive of stationary grids |
(2) Basic
Guidelines:
|
ANATOMY |
LINE |
RATIO |
DISTANCE |
|
SKULL |
103 |
10:1 |
36-40" |
|
CHEST |
103 |
10:1-12:1 |
60-72" |
|
ABDOMINAL |
103 |
8:1 |
34-44" |
|
SCOLIOSIS STUDIES |
85-103 |
8:1 |
48-72" |
|
SPECIAL
PROCEDURES |
LINE |
RATIO |
DISTANCE |
|
MOST STUDIES |
103 |
10:1 |
36-40" |
|
BI-PLANE |
85
criss-cross |
8:1 |
34-44" |
|
SURGICAL ROOM |
LINE |
RATIO |
DISTANCE |
|
ORTHOPEDICS |
85 |
8:1 |
34-44" |
|
CHOLANGIOGRAMS VENOUS STUDIES |
103 |
10:1 |
36-40" |
|
EMERGENCY ROOM |
LINE |
RATIO |
DISTANCE |
|
TRANS LATERAL SKULL, SPINES, HIPS |
60-85 |
6:1-8:1 |
34-44" |
Designed
to reduce grid cutoff, MXE decubitus grids position the lead
strips parallel to the short dimension of the grid-in line with
the cathode-anode direction of the x-ray tube when in the
translateral position. This allows greater positioning latitude
when aligning the x-ray tube with the grid.
Difference between the standard and decubitus grid

Features of the decubitus grid:
-
Improved
image quality-more uniform density on decubitus and BE air
contrast studies.
Ease of positioning with reduced cut-off.
-
Lines to
short dimension recommended for use in translateral views of
skull, spine, hips ...... emergency room and surgery.
-
Allow
portable crosswise chest radiography on large patients.
-
Available in
a full range of sizes and ratios.
Grid Labels:
Grids are
often marked with a series of idications about their properties
K is the Contrast Improvement Factor and is the ratio of
the
contrast with a grid to the contrast without a grid. This factor
is
dependent upon kVp, field size and thickness of tissue.
B is named after the celebrated Gustav Bucky and is the
Bucky
Factor and is the ratio of incident radiation to the grid compared
with the transmitted radiation passing
through the grid. It has great
practical use and is a factor that you apply when converting from
a
non-grid technique to a grid technique or vice versa. The B is
dependent upon the kVp becoming larger with increased kVp.
∑
is
selectivity which is usually
shown as a Sigma (like a M rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise).
This is the ratio of transmitted primary radiation to transmitted
scatter radiation and is very similar to the Primary transmission
ratio. This is a good measure of a grid because it should be high
with an efficient grid.
F
is the FFD or more correctly the focus grid distance, focussed
grids have an optimum working distance
R is the Grid
Ratio, the ratio of height to width of inter space material

Grid factor
Grid
Factor = Exposure(mAs) with a grid
Information from: http://www.mxe.com/
|